Revivalism
A
movement within the Christian tradition which emphasizes the appeal of religion
to the individual as well to their intellectual and rational nature. It
believes that vital Christianity begins with a response of the whole being to
the gospel's call for repentance and spiritual rebirth by faith in Jesus
Christ. This experience results in a personal relationship with God.
The
Reformation Roots. Modern revival
movements have their historical roots in Puritan-pietistic reactions to the
rationalism of the Enlightenment and the formalized creedal expression of
Reformation faith that characterized much of seventeenth century Protestantism.
People such as Philipp Spener, and
August Francke resisted this depersonalization of religion. They discovered a
more experiential element in Reformation faith which emphasized personal
commitment and obedience to Christ and a life regenerated by the indwelling
Holy Spirit. They also emphasized witness and missions as a primary
responsibility of the individual Christian and the church. Subjective religious
experience and the importance of the individual became a new force in renewing
and expanding the church. These concerns gradually permeated much of
Protestantism, especially the developing churches in America.
The Eighteenth Century Birth. The appeal for
the gospel that came to characterize revivalism sprang up almost simultaneously
in both England and America in the eighteenth century. The initial signs of the
First Great Awakening in the American colonies occurred in the congregation of
the Dutch Reformed pastor Theodore J. Frelinghuysen in northern New Jersey in
1725, a decade before John Wesley and George Whitefield began their field
preaching in England. Frelinghuysen had come under the influence of pietism
before coming to America. In 1726 William Tennent, the Presbyterian leader of
the Great Awakening, started his "log college" to prepare ministers
who would preach a personalized Gospel which called men and women to
repentance.
By
the time George Whitefield began recurrent revivalistic tours of the American
colonies in 1738, Jonathan Edwards, the theologian of the colonial awakening,
had already experienced a small revival in Northampton, massachusetts. Edwards
accepted the validity of much of the religious emotion that accompanied the
conversions among his parishioners and wrote in defense of the proper role of
emotion in true religion. The revival continued to move south until it touched
all the colonies. In England the recognized leader of the "Evangelical
Revival" was John Wesley, founder of Methodism and close friend of
Whitefield. Whitefield had encouraged Wesley to take up the field preaching
that brought the gospel directly to the masses of working people.
The
success of this appeal to the heart as well as the head could not be doubted.
Religious interest was renewed, and people flocked to the churches in
significant numbers in both America and England. American historians recognize
that the sweep of religious fervor from north to south (prior to the
Revolution) was one of the few unifying factors among the otherwise disparate
American colonies. In England the revival left an indelible religious and
social impact for stability in the midst of the revolutionary unrest which
pervaded most of Europe at the time.
It
was the Second Great Awakening at the beginning of the nineteenth century that
defined the theology and method of the tradition. The revival began at
Hampden-Sidney and Washington colleges in Virginia in 1787. It continued at
Yale under Timothy Dwight and at Andover and Princeton at the end of the
eighteenth century. It was popularized in the great camp meetings on the
frontier. The Cane Ridge, Kentucky, camp meeting in August, 1801, became the
most famous of all. The strange emotional phenomena which had shown themselves
in the earlier colonial revival reappeared in intensified form.
"Falling," "jerking," "rolling," and
"dancing" exercises engaged many of the twenty thousand worshipers
present. These demonstrations moderated as the revival continued, but physical
phenomena have always existed in some measure in revival movements.
Camp
Meetings and Revivalism. The Presbyterians who organized these first camp
meetings abandoned their use. The Methodists and Baptists, however, continued
to use them. The ambience of the natural setting in which the camps were held,
the release from the ordinary routines of home and church, the freedom to
worship together in a less sectarian context, the family reunion,
community-center flavor, all contributed to a mystique that made the camp
meeting a continuing factor in future revivalism. The frontier camp meetings
declined after the Civil War, but the Holiness revival which began to flourish
after the Civil War utilized them extensively in both rural and urban settings.
Camp meetings became the religious centers that shaped the theology and ethos
of the numerous Holiness churches organized at the end of the century.
In
Holiness and Pentecostal churches the camp meeting remains an essential
expression of their revivalistic worship. Even there, however, the camp meeting
has become more of a church family rally or reunion than a time for
evangelistic outreach to the unchurched.
The
outstanding figure in early nineteenth century revivalism was Charles
Finney. Finney took the revival ethos
of the frontier camp meeting to the urban centers of the northeast. His success
there and his widespread influence as a professor and later president of
Oberlin College gave him a platform for propagating a theology and defense of
the revival methods he espoused. In his Revival Lectures Finney contended that
God had clearly revealed the laws of revival in Scripture. Whenever the church
obeyed those laws, spiritual renewal resulted.
The importance which Finney attached to the necessity for prayer and the
agency of the Holy Spirit in his revival practice, had a great effect on the
opposition to revival .
Finney's
"new methods" raised as much controversy as his attachment to
"New School theology."
Preaching was direct,addressed to the individual, and usually delivered
without manuscript or even notes. The public nature of the conversionexperience
was focused by the introduction of the "anxious bench," by which the
serious seeker placed his intentions onrecord before the congregation. The
critics were especially wary of the public platform given to the laity and
especiallywomen as they prayed and testified in the revival services. After the
dramatic Fulton Street or Layman's Revival of 1858,however, most of the critics
were silenced, and revival meetings began set the predominant pattern of
AmericanProtestantism until about 1870.
Perfectionist Revivalism
A
significant new development in revivalism between 1835 and 1875 was the rise of
perfectionist revivalism. Finney introduced a perfectionist note into his
evangelism after his move to Oberlin College in 1835. He and his colleague Asa
Mahan, president of Oberlin, joined perfectionist leaders in Methodism, such as
lay leaders Walter and Phoebe Palmer, in a new Holiness revivalism in the
churches. The movement used revivalistic methods to call Christians to a second
crisis of faith and total commitment subsequent to conversion, commonly called
among Americans a "second
conversion," a "rest of faith," or the "deeper" or
"higher life"; to Methodists it was "entire
sanctification," "perfection in love," or "the second
blessing." The revival ultimately
gave prominence to a personal "fullness" or "baptism" of
the Holy Spirit in speaking of the experience.
The
creation of the National Camp meeting Association for the Promotion of Holiness
by John Inskip and other Methodist ministers in 1867 spread the movement beyond
Methodism around the world. In England the Holiness revival gave rise to the
Salvation Army and the Keswick Movement.
Large
audiences continued to attend the "revival campaigns" of R. A. Torrey, Gypsy Smith, and others after
the turn of the century. However, without the emphasis on Holyness, without the
prayer, we no longer saw revivals such as Charles Finney had been used of God
to produce. The results was the
"social Gospel." Critics such as H. L. Mencken, who turned the people
toward a gospel of social concern among the larger denominations, could lead
only to a decline in the influence of revivalism in the churches and in
American life.
Revivals
of religion and the theological presuppositions and practices which have
accompanied them through their history have consistently raised a common
pattern of criticism. The strongly emotional nature of the revivalist's appeal,
the greater the outcry from the Devil and his people!
See also An example
of true revival; PIETISM; CHARLES FINNEY